George Will vs John Kerry in the global warming ring

 Russ Steele

In this corner we find George Will, Op-Ed Columnist for The Washington Post. Priors to weight in Will challenged the premise of global warming and what we should do about it. But this was the paragraph that set off the hotheaded ice alamists:

As global levels of sea ice declined last year, many experts said this was evidence of man-made global warming. Since September, however, the increase in sea ice has been the fastest change, either up or down, since 1979, when satellite record-keeping began. According to the University of Illinois’ Arctic Climate Research Center, global sea ice levels now equal those of 1979.

In this corner we have John Kerry, Mass. Senator and failed Presidential Candidate, contributor to global warming causes writing at the Huffington Post:Facts Are Stubborn Things: George Will and Climate Change-

This has to stop. A highly organized, well-funded movement to deny the reality of global climate change has been up and running for a long time, but it doesn’t change the verdict: the problem is real, it’s accelerating, and we have to act. Now. Not years from now.

Kerry concludes his Huffington Post with this challenge to George Will:

"I’d happily debate him any day on this question so critical to our survival."

I am looking for to this debate, and willing to bet a few beers that Will fasts are more accurate than Kerry's facts. You can find more on the coming debate at Watts Up With That and ICECAP is also following the action, where you will find George Will's first round rebuttal in the debate.