Russ Steele
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce has called the EPA’s bluff on climate science. However, the EPA is not up for a science shoot out, instead they are hiding behind Ms. Jackson's skirts.
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, trying to ward off sweeping federal emissions regulations has challenged the Environmental Protection Agency to hold a public hearing on the scientific evidence for man-made climate change. You know the real science, with real scientist in the street, not dodgy computer models in the saloon basement.
The US Chamber has called out the EPA to put their science for critical examination, or fold and slink away. There’s no backing away from the challenge and the Chamber of Commerce is not known for shooting from the hip without a good idea that it’s aim is good. The cowardly response from EPA was:
Calling a hearing a “waste of time” and saying that a threatened lawsuit by the chamber would be “frivolous.”
EPA spokesman Brendan Gilfillan said the agency based its proposed finding that global warming is a danger to public health “on the soundest peer-reviewed science available, which overwhelmingly indicates that climate change presents a threat to human health and welfare.”
OK, EPA if your science is the top gun let's have a shoot out. Yours verses the real world.
If the the EPA science is top gun stuff, then why not take the opportunity to win a major case in a court — and the court of public opinion? The EPA failure to steep in to the street is nothing less than admission that much of the push for rash global warming legislation is built on hot air than cool, not the dispassionate science needed for policy making.
If the Chamber sticks to its guns, this could be the scientific gun fight of the century. I wonder if our local Chamber willing to the U.S. Chamber in this shoot out. My guess is they cannot be counted for any support. No show cowards at the climate change corral.
Update: You can not sustain a lie for ever and the putting global warming on trial should bring this one to an end, except for those with a religious preference to believe. The Climate Depot has a review of the evidence against the anthropogenic global warming case. Perhaps Anna can come up with the counter arguments for the anthropogenic side of the case.
Recent Comments