John H. Hinderaker is a lawyer who writes at Powerline with his former law partner Scott Johnson and Paul Mirengoff. Paul has put together a Case Study from one of the CRU e-mails threads, connecting the dots to demonstrate that global warming research was more about money and politics than science.
A fascinating, hot-off-the-presses story emerges from the emails that were hacked yesterday from the University of East Anglia's Hadley Climatic Research Centre. It is one of many exchanges that shed light on the priority that the global warming alarmists give to politics and career advancement over science.
The full case study is at Powerline. It is worth your time to read, as it gives context to why the CRU E-mails are important and why our political leaders should re-evaluate their positions on climate change and the need for controlling CO2 emissions with punitive cap and trade taxes. More importantly, you should understand the magnitude of this fraud and be conversant with it at the next cocktail party, club meeting and tea party rally. The current political class will try to sweep this under a convenient rug and ignore it. It will be up to everyone to keep this story on the front page, and on the desk of our political leaders until they come to their senses.
I hope that our left leaning bloggers take the time to read this case study and maybe they will understand why I called human caused global warming a hoax. Well now we know it was more than a hoax, it was outright fraud.
